Conventional Medicine became and remains very rigid in its control of how cancer is treated. There are now only three legal ways to treat cancer in the U.S.: surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Cut it, burn it, poison it, or a combination of these three. That's it.

Most people know the horror stories:

• The often disfiguring surgery that "got it all" but didn't.
• The chemotherapy that destroyed the quality of life without curing the patient.
• Cancer-causing, tissue-damaging radiation .
• "Heroic" treatment efforts...until the insurance ran out.
• The destruction of the immune system from radiation and chemo followed by unrelieved suffering and slow death.

The National Cancer Institute admits there has been "no substantial improvement in cancer cures in the past several decades!" This is why many cancer patients are opting for the more conservative, less invasive, less painful and cheaper alternative medicine route.

Unfortunately for those people, the United States Government (under control of the medical lobby) passed legislation that any cancer treatment used in the U.S. other than the AMA-sanctioned treatments of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy will be considered "quackery,"-- illegal and punishable as a felony.

It's hard to find alternative health care providers, but they do exist. So does information on alternative healing protocols and products.

"Over 200,000 deaths are caused yearly by drugs administered by doctors. When doctors go on strike, deaths decline from 25% to 60%." --T.C. Fry

Reclaim Your Life: If I get into an auto accident, rush me to the nearest hospital, and God bless the medical doctors who piece me back together. If I get sick, in most cases (there are always exceptions) rush me in the opposite direction, as far from "conventional medical treatment" as possible.

The clever "cult of modern medicine" (--Dr. Robert Mendelson, M.D.) has as its godhead the group of international pharmaceutical companies who dangle most of us from strings like giant, invisible puppet-masters who look down upon us as livestock for their larders. Where the money is, the power is, and they have both. Do they want us to get well? Of course not. A sudden "cure" for cancer would cause the collapse of our entire medical financial infra-structure. The reverberating consequences could be catastrophic. What they want is a world health system based on the TREATMENT OF DISEASE, not its cure--that would put them out of business. And as for the means of treatment, only drugs can be patented and produce high profit margins. Natural medicines can't and don't. As a result, they aren't even considered for testing or distribution unless some component can be synthesized and/or used exclusively. Drugs, drugs, drugs. That's what they peddle and we'd better empty the coffers and our pockets to pay the "tithe" or risk the wrath of MEDI-GOD. Yes, attendance at the Church of Modern Medicine is pretty much compulsory. If you doubt, "just say no" out loud to any demands made by medical orthodoxy.

Conventional medical schools also dance to their tune on the same set of strings and have fine-honed a system of brainwashing that puts the best covert government agency to shame. Sleep deprivation, fatigue, unrelieved stress, hardship, rote repetition of the "party line" of thinking, the implantation of a second-hand God-complex with almost surgical precision, a nearly impermeable circle of protection and support surrounding them, and money, money, money. No wonder they are so convincing--they swallowed the sweet bait hook, line and sinker! Those virtually unbreakable strings come attached for life in most cases. An added bonus--they recruit, recruit, recruit. The medical downline goes on and on until it permeates virtually every nook, cranny and orifice of our lives. Few escape, and not without great hardship and risk. Many martyrs perish in the process.

And the general public? We remain victimized by the greatest writers of revisionist history in the world, the most powerful plunderers of our personal freedom and ruthless invaders of our private lives. Our constitutional right to retain control of our own bodies and those of our children bit the dust with the rise in power of the A.M.A. This false God of Science and its cohorts exert incomprehensible control over us. Have we benefited? They would have us think so, but the truth is that in the 21st century we suffer from more mental, emotional, and physical disease, illness, disabilities, infection, birth defects, and medical injury than at any time in the known history of the world. In fact, iatrogenic disease (doctor-caused) kills over 200,000 people per year--4 times as many as the VietNam war overall. If this is "progress" we need to take a giant step backward for mankind. Even a small step improves the odds of survival.

These are harsh statements--the kind few people want to hear or believe. Its tantamount to pulling the rug out from under one's own feet. But what lies beneath that comforting rug? Something dirty and broke that needs to be cleaned and fixed. Have courage. Take the first step--make the decision to reclaim your life for yourself. That first step is a big one, but the only way to escape a highway to hell is to veer off onto a side road going another direction. That's the "road less traveled." Cut the cords and go for it.

The United States has the worst national health of any industrialized nation in the world:

• In 1900, 1 out of 100 people died of cancer--now it's 1 out of every 3. "156 per hour will learn they have cancer, and by the end of 2004, approximately 563, 700 people will have died of cancer this year. " (USA Today)
  
• Cancer is the top killer of children since 1958--the year mass vaccinations began
  
• The so-called "war on cancer" has won no major "battles" since it began several decades ago, in spite of spending more money on technology, treatment, and research than any other country. Small advances in a couple of obscure types of cancer have been offset by shocking failures elsewhere. Overall, cancer statistics continue to spiral out of control.
  
  More shocking statistics from The Myth of Health In America by T.C. Fry. Click on the link to read his comments and documented statistics on American health.

That which is considered "alternative" medicine now, was in the beginning of time until recent history all that medicine was, including the medicine of Hippocrates, the "Father of Medicine," the healing practices of the ancient Greeks, who were doing brain surgery and other types of treatments thousands of years ago, the Biblical health laws and guidelines, proven to be scientifically sound, up to the 19th century...when by-products of petroleum manufacture became the basis for "patent medicine" and the great and terrifying and all-powerful pharmaceutical industry was born, and with it's unlimited resources, pushed everything else aside and positioned itself as "modern medicine," "mainstream medicine," or "conventional medicine."

Anyone interested in the history of medicine, and the split between what is now considered "alternative" medicine, and "conventional medicine," should read the scholarly, 3-volume series "DIVIDED LEGACY,"--"A history of the schism in medical thought" by Harris Livermore Coulter,
Wehawken Book Co., 5104 Wehawken Rd., Washington, D.C. 20016.

Not unlike a giant steamroller, the forces of "modern medicine" began and continue the effort to crush under it's wheels all opposition--all those people, practices, and principles which oppose or otherwise threaten the profits and power structure and it's domination over the world population.

As an example of how intricately interwoven our lives and fortunes are with the international pharmaceutical houses, it has been stated in print (source lost) that if a "cure" for cancer was suddenly announced, that the entire financial structure of the United States would collapse. The terrifying implications almost defy comprehension.

And how have we fared at the hands of those wielding "conventional medical wisdom" as a blunt instrument, with the force of law behind it?

Certainly, the plagues of the past faded away, and the raging epidemics of infectious disease went into a steep decline, but how? If you want a summary of modern disease control measures, talk to a surveyor, not a medical doctor. Their profession created modern hygiene through the design and implementation of public waste disposal, clean water systems, etc. When public hygiene came in, the "filth diseases" of the past went out. That includes smallpox, polio, measles, mumps, rubella, yellow fever, diphtheria, tetanus, and other diseases of contamination that vaccinators fraudulently claimed to have eradicated in spite of the fact that they were all at the end of epidemics when vaccines were introduced, immediately after increased in numbers, except in those countries who refused mass vaccination and saw the epidemics go without "medical" intervention.

The practice of vaccination provides a prime example of this argument. It began in the 1780's with Edward Jenner, who purchased a medical license without training, and used a superstition--a "milkmaid's myth" that exposure to cowpox, a disease unrelated to smallpox, would somehow confer immunity to smallpox in the days when it was epidemic. The results, well-documented by leading scientists, physicians, and statisticians of the time, spelled disaster to the population of England and all those who followed later. More vaccinated people than not contracted and died from the disease. But vaccination was immediately a big business with tremendous profits, which superceded the dismal statistical evidence of vaccination failure, and so the practice of "revisionist history" became the "company line." Look up "The History and Pathology of Vaccination" by Edgar Crookshank, M.D. (or just "Edgar Crookshank") on the internet. Reviews and summaries of this scathing review by a leading medical epidemiologist of the 19th century provide a picture of the true beginnings of the vaccination industry, and that's only the beginning.

http://www.newswithviews.com/health_care/health_care5.htm

http://www.downunderwebsites.com/vaccination.htm

http://www.whale.to/a/crookshank.html

http://www.naturodoc.com/library/public_health/truth_re_smallpox_vaccine.htm

In the case of common childhood vaccines, each one came on the scene at the tail end of an epidemic, and statistically speaking, had no positive effect on the ending of that epidemic. In fact, much evidence suggests that mass vaccinations negatively effected the outcomes of waning epidemics, which were world-wide and ended more quickly and with less complications in countries and among peoples who were unvaccinated, than among those who were. That includes smallpox and polio. The World Health Organization claims "victory" over smallpox through their world-wide vaccination program, but WHO field workers give a different story--of epidemics caused by the vaccine (known and admitted by scientific sources to be more dangerous than the disease), rather than curtailed by it, and the final strategy of reverting back to the old Biblical practice of quarantine as the actual control agent of the disease. However, WHO publicists announced "the eradication of smallpox" due to their vaccination efforts. And never mind that there are now epidemics of "monkey pox" which just happen to look, feel, and smell like smallpox. (Renaming a disease after outbreaks of said "eradicated" disease long ago became common practice.)

What the "authorities" tell the public and what shows up in scientific journals and documents often contradict each other. According to World Health Statistics Annual, 1973-76, Vol.2, "there has been a steady decline of infectious diseases in most developing countries regardless of the percentage of immunizations administered in these countries."

The true stories are out there, much more accessible now thanks to the internet, but the general public has been continually force-fed a revisionist version of vaccination history and efficacy and necessity so aggressively that a condition of near brain washing or mind control successfully turned most of us into puppets of the almighty medical machinery, and woe be to those who attempt to turn away from "The Church of Modern Medicine," or refuse to worship it's god-like doctor/priests, or to commit the biggest sin--to withhold tithe. They don't behead or hang such "medical heretics" these days. It's so much more "civilized" to starve them.

Where are we today? According to Dr. Harold E. Buttram, M.D., in his comments in the book "Vaccines--Are They Really Safe And Effective?" by Neil Z. Miller, "There is at present time an ominous trend in America towards deteriorating health in children and young adults, a trend which is well substantiated by scientific statistical reports. Allergic diseases such as asthma and eczema are rapidly increasing in both frequency and severity. autoimmune diseases (afflictions in which antibodies or immune cells attack the tissues of one's own body) have increased many fold in the past several generations. Perhaps most ominous of all is the rise in childhood behavioral disorders, including hyperactivity and learning disorders, with approximately 15-25 percent of children now being classified as learning disabled. A substantial portion of today's children are receiving frequent courses of antibiotics for treatment of recurrent ear infections and/or respiratory illness, a pattern which suggests an increasing prevalence of immune impairment when compared with earlier generations. among young adult of today there are the newly emerging and poorly understood syndromes of chemical sensitivity and chronic fatigue, conditions which are disabling millions of our youth who should be entering the prime of their lives."

Dr. Buttram goes on to describe multiple causes for downward health trends, including our horrendous diet of "white man's food" with it processed foods lacking vital nutrients, enzymes and basic food value and greater exposure to environmental toxins. But he expresses deep concern for "the role of routine mass inoculation of children in the increasing patterns of disabled immunity."

Much evidence in the scientific literature, which will be discussed in the section on vaccination, suggests there is "a direct relationship between vaccinations and the modern epidemics of chronic fatigue, autoimmune disorders, AIDS, learning disabilities, and other health problems as well."

He explains that "the immature immune system must run a gauntlet of infectious challenges in order to become strong and resistant, a process which under normal circumstances requires 10 to 12 years."

He believes that the "normal" childhood diseases served a major role in the normal development and strengthening of the immune systems of children, and by interfering with this process through vaccination, that the stage was set for serious chronic/degenerative disease.

Other medical authorities and researchers believe that vaccines themselves, with their numerous viral and bacterial contaminants--particularly from animal sources, and pooled human blood products--heavy metals and other toxins, given direct access to the blood producing organs, and with their extreme immune system challenges, have in themselves damaged by over stimulation or suppression the immune systems of all but those with the strongest constitutions.

http://www.mercola.com/2001/may/5/vaccination_fraud.htm 
 
http://www.therapyinbromley.co.uk/vaccinebooks.htm

http://www.vaclib.org/news/poxnews1202a.htm

Take a closer look at President George W. Bush's "Homeland Security Act" with it's license to force vaccinations on people without any governmental liability for vaccine damages. The following website info also claims that until last year, President Bush's family co-owned, along with the Bin Laden family, the company that produces the anthrax vaccine, which many soldiers have been court-martialed for refusing to take. Just this morning (12-23-03) the announcement was made that a Federal judge had ruled compulsory anthrax vaccination to be "unconstitutional."

http://www.naturodoc.com/library/bio-war/America_warned.htm

Vaccination represents just one single issue among many. And how do medical "authorities" funded by the great pharmaceutical houses respond to this issue, with it's increasingly public and well-documented dangers and failures?" Bigger ad campaigns, more stringent laws, less tolerance towards anyone criticizing public policy and more adversity for concerned parents who dare to question or resist "conventional medical wisdom."

The more medical failure becomes apparent and their profits are threatened and influence falters, the tighter and more deadly their lethal grip around our collective necks. We need great strength to prevail, and a bright light to guide the way through this darkening medical morass.

This site represents a collection of many points of light, hopefully enough to illuminate in some small way the rough-hewn and rocky path before us.

This site is dedicated to those on a personal quest for alternatives to ineffective and often dangerous forms of conventional medical treatment.--DJT

(Important Disclaimer: The information made available on this site is for educational and informational purposes only. Please consult your health care provider for treatment advice.)