SUBJECT: VACCINATORS DESPERATE--GOEBBELS SCIENCE OF LYING
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” --Joseph Goebbels
New TDaP Exemption Form: Goebbels Science of Lying
The drug companies are in a panic to respond to this new awakening. But their shrill and hysterical responses are having the opposite effect than what they intend. Look at the ridiculous swine flu fantasy that failed so miserably in 2009. We were all going to die if we didn’t get the vaccine, remember? But the hype didn’t ring true and Americans rejected the vaccine. Then a funny thing happened. The ‘’global pandemic’ vaporized. Poof!. Gone. Never heard from again.
The next desperate attempt to salvage some use for all those vaccines was to include the discarded H1N1 vaccines in this year’s flu shot. And this is why there are more reactions, miscarriages, and deaths from flu shots this year. People are starting to notice annoying little things like that. With google and Facebook it’s getting much harder to hide the obvious these days.
Then we began to see the hysteria spill over to all the Long’s and Walgreens everywhere with their emergency posters screaming vaccines and more vaccines.
Next we saw California’s desperate push for 7th graders to get the TDaP shot. In Sacramento where many school districts are so strapped for cash they’re eliminating all frills, such as sports, arts, and text books, they actually hired people to go door to door to remind parents to get their school kids vaccinated. They couldn’t get rid of the Personal Beliefs Exemption, because it protects the schools from being sued. So what they did instead was to make up a new one just for TDaP, which the child must present in addition to the standard form.
You can see the new TDaP Personal Beliefs Exemption by clicking. Let’s look at the wording for a second.
“To be signed by Parent or Guardian
“The unimmunized child and the child’s contacts at school and home are at greater risk of becoming sick with pertussis, which can be life threatening for young infants and can cause prolonged illness at any age.
“I understand that for the protection of the child and other students the child may be excluded from attending school for prolonged periods during each outbreak of pertussis or after each exposure to someone with pertussis.
“I hereby request exemption of the child named above from the pertussis (whooping cough) immunization requirement for school entry because such immunization is contrary to my beliefs. “
Whew! Rarely has such a combination of direct falsehood and fascist promo been assembled in such a small package. I’m sure Josef Goebbels is well pleased.
1. Let’s start with the second word: unimmunized. The central thesis of the new vaccine text, this incorrect use of the word immunized makes the false assumption that vaccines confer immunization. Immunization is something the body does, and only after being exposed to disease. Immunization has nothing to do with needles, or vaccines. When they say unimmunized they mean unvaccinated. A very clever and studied semantic trick - pretending the two are the same thing. They’re not. Vaccination Is Not Immunization.
2. “The unimmunized child and the child’s contacts at school and home are at greater risk of becoming sick with pertussis..”
Only half true. The true part is that most of the child’s contacts at school will be vaccinated with multiple shots of DPT. For that reason those vaccinated kids truly are at greater risk of getting pertussis. Yes, there have been many outbreaks of pertussis during the past 8 years, at many locations – New Mexico, Oregon, Arizona, California, etc., but in every single location the vast majority, if not all of the infected kids had been vaccinated with multiple doses of DPT. It is virtually certain that the disease came from the vaccine. Because before we started vaccinating kids for DPT back in the 1950s pertussis had all but disappeared. The vaccines have mutated it and brought it back. This is a matter of record.
So therefore the sentence is only half true. The unvaccinated child actually has a lesser chance of getting pertussis since the disease is now being perpetuated only by the vaccine. There have been virtually no cases of pertussis among the unvaccinated. And it is most likely that even those few cases contracted it from being around the majority of kids vaccinated with this most toxic of all vaccines. Everybody knows that unvaccinated kids rarely get sick at all. Ask around.
My suggestion is that the parent cross out this first paragraph before signing the form. It has nothing to do with the exemption or parent’s rights. It is an absolutely false, scientifically unsupported statement, and by signing the paper the parent is being forced to bear witness to the lie. If the issue ever went to court, no one could make a case that crossing out this paragraph invalidates the exemption.
Or at the very least cross out the two letters “un” in front of unimmunized. Less noticeable.
Remember, 75% of all vaccine injury compensation paid out in this country since 1991 has been for damage from the DPT shot. If you’re only going to skip one shot, that would be it.
3. “I understand that for the protection of the child and other students the child may be excluded from attending school for prolonged periods during each outbreak of pertussis or after each exposure to someone with pertussis.”
This wording is a masterpiece in the Bernays science of lying. First off, we must understand that the primary purpose of all vaccine exemptions forms is to protect the school from being sued by the parent of the unvaccinated child who might catch a disease from one of the vaccinated kids. That’s how much confidence they have in their vaccines. So you agree that you will keep your unvaccinated kid home from school if disease breaks out among the vaccinated population. That’s how it’s always been.
But now in this new version they added the words “and other students” which is going to pretend that the vaccinated students are being protected from the unvaccinated kid being removed from school. These 3 words completely change the nature of the document from the old exemption form. Which incidentally the child still needs to be exempt from the rest of the vaccines.
4. The last thing is the phrase “I hereby request..” This isn’t Iraq or Bahrain or Vietnam. The people don’t make requests from the school or the state for basic rights. By signing this form, the parent is informing the school that the child will be exempt from vaccines. Period. This is government by the people not government by the state. Let’s at least pretend we remember that. And cross out the word ‘request’ and the 3 letters “ion” after exemption, and the word ‘of’ - so it reads “I hereby exempt the child named above…”
My opinion is that this new document is completely redundant and that it could be challenged in court that the original exemption form is sufficient to get the kid out of vaccines. The original covers the TDaP shot as well as all other vaccines by its very definition. The original form is still the standard legal vaccine exemption form in California. This new form is not only unnecessary, it is scientifically insupportable and makes parents bear witness to direct falsehoods. Some informed lawyer with children needs to come forth and challenge this Draconian new form as redundant, nonbinding, and unconstitutional in court.
Until that happens, I believe the least parents should do is make the above crossouts. Or else follow the steps for the Affidavit of Exemption form contained in the new vaccine text and forget about both these exemptions forms.
2. Upcoming Seminars
The Chiropractic Seminar
Orange County -- 3 Dec (with Billy D)
Explaining why patients should care
Discussing neural summation
The adjustment and somatovisceral effects
Explaining altered sensory-motor neurology
Explaining altered biomechanics and disease
Spinal lesions alter brain neurology
How the adjustment changes the brain
What doctors must know Explaining what patients must know
Altered sensory-motor neurology and disease
How spinal lesions cause disease
Mastering a technique: the art of change
Disc and joint capsule nutrition
How today’s best neuroscience validates the original ideas of DD and BJ
No more equivocation, OK? What are they trying to do to our profession? Either chiropractic is a real and vital profession or it isn’t. What special skill does the chiropractor have to offer that no other profession can provide? Why do we seem afraid to talk about it?
This nuts and bolts seminar will give the doctor a useful and defensible understanding of chiropractic not readily available to the profession today, with a focus on the communication of these ideas to those who have failed to be cured by other doctors. We will take an unflinching look at what is really going on within the profession today.
Looking at the biology of the adjustment, aberrant afferents, neuroplasticity, and issues of genetics and epigenetics in the replicating organism. Chiropractic at the top of the healing arts – unbounded potential. Why the ‘leaders’ don’t know it.
First time in Seattle and Orange County for this one day event, the focus is to take an unflinching look at what is really happening with our profession today, and to underscore the value of chiropractic care, now more than ever before. Why are there some docs with a hobby practice and others with rocking practices, both in the same town?
Other lecturers offer the pieces of the puzzle, but here we connect the dots. We will say what others are afraid to say.
We’ll learn how today’s best science is validating chiropractic’s traditional principles, fundamentals which are being vilified by many voices within the profession. How the adjustment can affect a higher order of biology than just the mechanical.
Learn that there is a story. Learn to tell the story.
“The diversity of information gathered in one seminar, organized in such an understandable way was fantastic!” - SJ seminar, Jan 2011
“The energy is fabulous and uplifting.” – C. Siga, DC, Denver
“Inspiring seminar! Glad I brought my staff. Glad to see authenticity return to chiropractic.” – Barcelona doctor
“All fired up – ready to save more lives!” - Dr D Johnson, Denver
“Loved the facts and statistics that I can hold onto and really use in practice.” – JC Milrod, DC, Salinas
“The profession is in great need of this type of seminar—should be required for all new graduates”
Dr T. Schroeder, Thousand Oaks
“Quite painless... actually informative!” Dr K Sera, Long Beach
“Refreshing to hear an instructor not afraid to speak the truth...most people validating chiropractic seem very insecure about it -- not this doc.” Dr DC Fair Oaks
Tuition: $169 in advance, $199
Registration: 408 298 1800 or
doc[ @ ]thedoctorwithin.com
Please see link for course content
Oklahoma City 20 Nov 2011
A survey course of the complete full day Vaccine and Nutrition seminars:
- Complete autism chelation
- Peanut Allergy Epidemic
Now in its 10th year, this is the only full day seminar in the profession that takes a reliable look at vaccine problems.
“You are right about pure blood; that is the key.” Ted H. Spence, DDS
“Annihilated so many myths about nutrition…info I can really use in my practice.” Dr Fred, Seattle
“Had to take 204 CE hours all in one year…your Nutrition Seminar was the best by far.” Dr. MM
“First time I’ve ever been glad the state board required CE.” Dr. AC, Las Vegas
3. New Vaccine Text: 2012
Vaccination Is Not Immunization
Sorry! The 2010 book with the black cover is sold out. Thank you!
We are now taking advance orders for the brand new 2012 Second Edition of the book, which should be ready to ship in mid-October 2011. The new edition is a complete re-write, not just a reprint of the old book.
The book for parents who want to end the confusion once and for all on whether they should vaccinate or not.
In addition to the historical data and the ongoing problems with individual vaccines, the new book will have sections on
- The Pourcyrous Study: the peer reviewed medical study proving exactly how vaccines cause brain hemorrhages, apnea, and heart damage in infants.
- The Peanut Allergy Epidemic: how vaccines have been found as the proven cause of over 1 million children hypersensitive to peanuts, now the #1 cause of child anaphylaxis
- The new Shaken Baby industry, a massive cover-up for vaccine injury
- The ongoing Autism Epidemic, affecting between 2 -4 million children today and NIH’s refusal to look for the cause
This research is effectively banned from mainstream media, for reasons which will be obvious. As always though, each fact, each statistic is meticulously documented from the best sources available. There is nothing sensationalistic or conspiracy based about the actual physical science behind brain injury and vaccines. The solid references make this information bulletproof: it is virtually unassailable.
The vaccine industry today is in a panic. It can no longer keep these secrets hidden. More and more people are learning about the real brain effects in their children, and they’re opting out, signing the exemptions. That’s what all the hysterical new law enforcement about school vaccines is really about.
As a parent, whether or not to vaccinate the child is the most important decision you will ever make for that child’s health.
Do you even know what Prevnar or Human Papilloma Virus, or MCV4 or DPT – do you even know what these vaccines are for? And even if you do, wouldn’t you like to know what the scientists who make the vaccines have said about them, down through the decades? Or are you going to get all your information from the clinic that makes its living selling vaccines? Trust them implicitly to make the most important decision of the child’s life. That’s what we do.
It would be the same as if you were buying a Ford and you got all your information about cars only from the Ford dealer and nowhere else. Except this is much worse – this isn’t about the car you drive. This is about the formative immune system of your child, which is established in the early years, and largely determines their health throughout their lives.
We are shocked to find that many medical doctors know the information in this book and do not vaccinate their own children. But they’ll vaccinate yours. The majority of the endorsements on the back cover of the book are from medical doctors. Here’s one of the most recent:
"It is impossible to estimate the true value of Dr O'Shea's work. His review of the history of the vaccination industry is vastly more thorough than that taught in medical schools and decisively more balanced.
"Many primary care providers and parents who assume that the vaccine program was built on sound principles will be shocked at the flimsy foundations of immunization science. While the public is rarely exposed to the full extent of vaccine adverse reactions, Dr O'Shea takes the reader through a thorough review of each disease and the risk/benefit of their vaccine counterpart.
"The book will serve as a valuable resource to parents and physicians. Parents need no longer feel guilty or confused about the decision to vaccinate their children. Knowledge is the freedom and power to decide with confidence what is best for their children.
"With explosions in chronic illnesses in virtually all subsets of our population, critical thinking is necessary to protect our loved ones and our future. O'Shea has once again blessed us with a resource that will allow parents to make an informed choice, and for medical professionals to take pause at what they had been indoctrinated to believe was valid science and good medicine."
The definitive book on vaccines today. Vaccination Is Not Immunization, 2nd Edition 2012
As California doctors will know, as of 7 Oct 11, DCs are now required to have patients sign a consent form. The regulation was rushed through virtually in secret with almost no opportunity for opposition from the profession. The requirements of the form are vague at best, but must somehow certify that the doctor has explained the dangers of treatment to the patient and the patient consents to be adjusted anyway.
The wording of the provision:
“A licensed doctor of chiropractic shall verbally and in writing inform each patient of the material risks of proposed care. “Material” shall be defined as a procedure inherently involving known risk of serious bodily harm. The chiropractor shall obtain the patient’s written informed consent prior to initiating clinical care. The signed written consent shall become part of the patient’s record. “
The confused regulation creates more problems than it solves. No sample forms are offered, nor are the specifics of what the form must contained clearly listed. The doctor is encouraged to “consult a lawyer” who will opine whether or not his particular composition passes muster or not.
Probably one of the more elegant commentaries on the radical new law can be seen at Dr Gerry Clum’s site: www.drgerryclum.com/uploads/GWC_Informed_consent_9_25_11_1120_1_.pdf
As far as known risks, if that were the only criteria and all you do is adjust the spine, it should be a no-brainer. There are none. Consider these data:
When all the factors are taken together, deaths and injuries from a combination of medical mistakes and intentional drugs dwarf any injuries from chiropractic.
The 2001 Canadian Medical Association Journal found there is only a one-in-5.85-million risk that a chiropractic neck adjustment will cause a stroke. Author David Cassidy, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Toronto said patients had already damaged the artery before seeking help from either a medical doctor or a chiropractor, and then the stroke occurred after the visit.
Risk of stroke? Virtually zero chance of stroke from chiropractic. The largest study ever done – the 2008 study in Canada: www.belleviewchiro.com/index.php?p=213660 – looking at 12 million people over 9 years, showed that 53% of strokes had visited their MD within 30 days prior, while only 4% had visited their DC. No evidence of excess risk of stroke associated chiropractic care.
Of course just the fact that stroke is the #2 cause of death in the US and that chiropractic is the largest natural system of health care, by virtue of statistics alone a certain number of people would have a stroke soon after an office visit. But the point is there is no evidence of a cause and effect relationship between the 2 events.
Many see the new regulation as a marketing opportunity – we bring up the notion of injury from treatment and compare statistics with medicine. We can also discuss the risks of NOT getting treatment for a subluxated spine: disc degeneration, altered afferents, loss of tone, loss of mobility, etc.
Dianne Jacobs Thompson Est. 2003
Also http://legaljustice4john.com The Misdiagnosis of "Shaken Baby Syndrome" --an unproven theory without scientific support, now in disrepute and wreaking legal and medical havoc world-wide
Author publication: NEXUS MAGAZINE "Seawater--A Safe Blood Plasma Substitute?"
The material on this site is for informational and educational
purposes only. Please consult with your health care provider for treatment