| Getting
a vaccination does not guarantee immunity. (~CDC, January 28,
1994.) "Neutralizing
antibodies are reported to reflect levels of protection, although
this has not been validated in the field." (~Journal
of the American Medical Association, June 9, 1999, Vol. 281.
No. 22) Vaccines made from animal substrate contain animal
viruses that are impossible to filter out. By 1961, scientists
discovered that animal viruses in vaccines, including smallpox,
could act as a carcinogen when given to mice in combination with
cancer-causing chemicals, even in amounts too small to induce
tumors alone. They concluded that vaccine viruses function as
a catalyst for tumor production. (~Science, December
15, 1961.) By the 1920s, several British medical researchers documented
that smallpox was not only more common among the VACCINATED, but
that the DEATH RATE from smallpox was actually higher among those
who had been vaccinated. This indicates that the vaccine was ineffective
and predisposed vaccinated persons to more lethal disease. (~Vaccination,
Dr. Viera Scheibner, Australia, 1993, pp. 205-220.)
"Expert" Believes Infants
Can Tolerate 10,000 Vaccines
By Sherri Tenpenny, DO
Addressing Parents' Concerns
"Do Multiple Vaccines Overwhelm
or Weaken the Infant's Immune System"
By Dr. Paul Offit, et. al.
Pediatrics, Vol. 109 No. 1, Jan. 2002
Summary of the Recent Pediatrics article:
One hundred years ago, children received 1 vaccine (the smallpox
vaccine). Forty years ago, children received 5 vaccines routinely
(diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio, and smallpox vaccines)
and as many as 8 shots by 2 years of age. Today, children receive
11 vaccines routinely and as many as 20 shots by 2 years of age.
Recent national surveys show that about 25% of the parents are
waking up and questioning if all these shots are necessary of
if the vaccines might actually weaken the immune system.
Dr. Offit attempts to explain the effect of vaccines on the
infant's immune system and the capacity of the immune system to
respond safely to multiple vaccines.
Passively Acquired Immunity
The neonate is, in part, protected against disease by maternal
immunoglobulins (Ig). Maternal IgG is transported across the placenta
before birth and maternal secretory IgA is present in breast milk
and colostrum. These passively acquired antibodies provide protection
against pathogens to which the mother was immune.
Dr. Offit states that maternal antibodies offer limited and
short-term immunologic protection when compared with protection
afforded by an infant's active immune response.
Dr. Offit then goes on to explain that a young infant is fully
capable of generating protective humoral and cellular immune responses
to multiple vaccines simultaneously. He then uses some physiological
immune facts to come to the outrageous conclusion that an infant
would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10, 000
vaccines at any one time, and then goes on to say that this is
a conservative estimate!
Dr. Tenpenny's Response to Above
Article:
It always amazes me when highly respected journals such as Pediatrics
are willing to publish articles such as this. And what is even
more amazing is that the people who write this information call
themselves "physicians" and "scientists."
Passive protection conveyed by
the mother is dismissed as less effective than a vaccine.
However, much research clearly documents that more protection
is conferred through breast milk than through artificially-induced
antibodies. Breast milk contains large quantities of secretory
IgA, lysozyme-secreting macrophages, and both T- and B-lymphocytes.
The lymphocytes release of gamma interferon, migration inhibition
factors and monocyte chemotatic factors, all of which strengthen
the intrinsic immune response of the infant. [1]
In addition, the protection provided by breast milk is not short-lived.
There is evidence that the enhanced protection it provides lasts
for years.[2] In addition, concentrations of antibodies found
at six weeks of lactation are the same levels as those at six
months, so any amount of breast-feeding contributes to immune
enhancement. [3]
Children less than 2 years of age are considered to be more susceptible
to infections by H. influenza type b and Streptococcus pneumoniae
bacterium, both major causes of otitis media and invasive bacterial
diseases. Although the infant's immune system may be less capable
of "mounting a response" to the polysaccharide cell
walls of the bacteria than an adult's immune system, infection
can again be offset by breast milk.
Components within the milk have been found to inhibit both colonization
and tissue adherence. [4,5] The premise that conjugate vaccines
are essential for the protection of an infant omits this important
fact.
Vaccine-specific antibody protection is considered to be the
cornerstone of vaccination success. In all studies published on
vaccines, "efficacy" is considered to be the development
antibodies. When vaccines are given together, the combination
is considered "effective" if both antigens generate
an antibody response at least equal to the response seen if a
single antigen vaccine is given alone.
However, is this an antibody response
a valid presumption of disease protection?
Even experts in the field admit that they don't know. During
a discussion regarding the approval of yet another acellular pertussis
vaccine, a panel member said,
"…A basic question is: Is antibody correlated with
protection? In the year 2000, we don't really know which antibodies
protect, let alone exactly what level of an antibody protects."
Another panelist went on to say, "The protective mechanisms
[of the immune system] are not understood. Is it antibody or is
it cell mediated or some assessment of memory that can occur in
response to infection?" [6]
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) discloses
this regarding the pertussis vaccine, "The findings
of efficacy studies have not demonstrated a direct correlation
between antibody response and protection against pertussis disease."
Antibody studies are only useful to compare immune responses
elicited between similar vaccines. Efficacy studies to measure
clinical protection conferred by each pertussis vaccine have not
been done. [7]
Therefore, antibodies apparently
mean nothing.
The H. flu vaccine has been found to have high avidity in vitro.
This means that there is a high affinity of attachment between
the antigen and the antibody. However, "the contribution
[of this] to clinical protection is unknown." [8]
Again, "efficacy" as defined by the development of
antibodies apparently means nothing in relation to disease protection.
Therefore, using the antigen binding capacity of the immune system
and its ability to create an antibody response as a measure of
safety, also means nothing.
The concept that 10,000 antigens could theoretically be deposited
uneventfully into the blood stream of either an infant or an adult
defies logic and is a blatant disregard for mechanisms of human
physiology.
By injecting a vaccine into the body, the first four lines of
normal immune defense are by-passed:
* Skin,
* Mucous membranes,
* Gut lymphoid tissue and
* Lymphatic neutralization
This abnormal introduction of pathogens and adjuvants into the
blood stream does not "trick" the immune system: it
contaminates it.
And contaminate it we do. Children now receive 52 vaccines, in
the form of 15 shots, buy the time they are 6 months of age if
they receive all the recommend shots, including the Prevnar®
(the pediatric pneumonia shot.) That is because each viral or
bacterial particle contained in the vaccine elicits an immune
response.
So, the measles, mumps and rubella vaccines are three separate
vaccines. The injectable polio vaccine (IPV) contains three strains
of polio, thus it is three vaccines. And this overwhelming amount
of biological material does not include the adjuvants, which can
included MSG, aluminum, formaldehyde, sucrose and phenoxyethanol,
which is antifreeze, among many others.
The potential for disaster looms as multiple live and attenuated
viruses are combined during multiple vaccinations on the same
day. In a study reported in Science Magazine, two avirulent herpes
viruses were simultaneously injected in the footpads of mice.
Many (62%) of the mice that had received equal doses of each virus
died while none died that had received up to 100 times the diluted
dose of just one virus.
Eleven recombinant viruses were isolated from the dead mice.
Three of these isolates were lethal when injected into the next
set of mice. This study demonstrates that in vivo, two avirulent
viruses can recombine with deadly results. [9] If two vaccine
antigens can cause a serious outcome when given simultaneously,
then what about "only 123-126"? Or 10,000?
Once again, a "ground breaking" medical study has drawn
media attention by posting conclusions that are not supported
by facts. Stating that an infant has a large capacity to respond
to antigens, i.e. create an antibody response, does nothing to
allay reasonable fears and doubts by investigative parents.
Any "thinking doctor" should recognize this "study"
for what it is: another opportunity to spread the mantra of "safe
and effective" vaccines. Perhaps in this way we won't question
the more than 200 vaccines that are currently in development or
resist the more than 20 that are anticipated to become part of
the childhood vaccination schedule by 2010.
A "thinking parent" might
conclude that, "if the immune system is that strong, why
do we need to vaccinate at all?
References
- Scientific American, December 1995; Volume 273; No. 6, Page
76
- Hanson, -L-A. Ann.All.Asth Imm.1998 Dec; 81(6):523-33
- Pichichero, M.E, et. al. J.Infect.Dis. 1980 Nov; 142(5);
694-8.
- Hokama,-T, et. al. Pediatr-Int. 1999 Jun; 41(3): 277-80
- Hanson, LA. Acta-Paediatr-Jpn. 1994 Oct; 36(5): 557-61
- Transcript of Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory
Committee Meeting, Friday, November 3, 2000, p. 107, 120.
- MMWR March 28, 1997/Vol. 46/No. RR-7, pg. 4
- 2002 Physician's Desk Reference, HibTITER, p. 1860.
- Javier RT, Searati, F., Stevens, JB. Science 1986 Nov. 7;234(4777):746-8.
|